Paid
Relationship. Don't
act confused or bewildered; you know what a paid relationship is. For
those of you not in the loop, paid relationships are situations where a person
is sexually involved with another for profit. If you give your "man"
some because he pays a bill, then you're in a paid relationship. If you give
your "man" some because he bought you a Louis Stewart bag, you are in
a paid relationship. You provided sex for a profit. If you give your
"man" some because he bought you a ring or a bracelet, you are
in a paid relationship. A person that provides sexual relations to a
person that pays for sex is what?
Yes, I
know what you're thinking, "I ain't no ho." Really? You aren't one?
What is a prostitute? What is ho? A person that provides sex in
exchange for profit-whether it's monetary or material gain, has always
been classified as a prostitute. If you disagree, go to the Casual
Encounters section on Craigslist. There are dozens of ads that suggest
sex-for-profit. Some prostitutes attempt to sophisticate their base profession
by using the word donation. Moreover, the hos on Eros-Guide will insist
that they are not prostituting, either. They suggest that their $300-sometimes
$400- fee is for companionship; in the event of "companionship",
sex might occur, but that is not what they are paid
for. These high-end hookers insist that they are paid for companionship and
companionship only.
It's sad,
isn't it? Not even hookers want to admit that they are hookers. Nevertheless,
dress it up however you want, a ho provides sexual relations for a profit.
Period. It doesn't matter if that ho has a hundred clients, or if that ho has
one client that is wrongly identified as a spouse. A person that receives a
profit for providing sexual favors is a ho, a prostitute, a hooker, a
tramp-case closed. A monogamous ho is still a ho-right or wrong? If your
"man" is only getting some when he pays a bill, or when you get your
nails done, hair done or you profit in some kind of way, how are you not a ho?
Yes, I know
what you're thinking. I know what you're thinking because I have had
"girlfriends" tell me this before: Nothing in this world is free. They
couldn't be intimate solely out of expressing love. If they were going to
give it up, it was on the grounds that they were getting something in return.
This brings me to my point and the thesis of this blog: you are a ho if you
only have sex with the expectance of some kind of financial or material gain.
More importantly, you are in a paid relationship if you sex is provided in
exchange for material or monetary gain.
It's sad, isn't it? Not even hookers want to admit that they are hookers. Nevertheless, dress it up however you want, a ho provides sexual relations for a profit. Period. It doesn't matter if that ho has a hundred clients, or if that ho has one client that is wrongly identified as a spouse. A person that receives a profit for providing sexual favors is a ho, a prostitute, a hooker, a tramp-case closed. A monogamous ho is still a ho-right or wrong? If your "man" is only getting some when he pays a bill, or when you get your nails done, hair done or you profit in some kind of way, how are you not a ho?
Yes, I know what you're thinking. I know what you're thinking because I have had "girlfriends" tell me this before: Nothing in this world is free. They couldn't be intimate solely out of expressing love. If they were going to give it up, it was on the grounds that they were getting something in return. This brings me to my point and the thesis of this blog: you are a ho if you only have sex with the expectance of some kind of financial or material gain. More importantly, you are in a paid relationship if sex is provided in exchange for material or monetary gain.
andRe Christos Helios
The YHWH, His Royal Rudeness, K.O.C.
andRe
Christos Helios
No comments:
Post a Comment