Sunday, February 24, 2013

The First Date . . .

As promised, The First Date. The first date is where we make the first impression. We make sure that we are well-groomed. We have on our best outfit. We spray ourselves down with our best cologne or perfume. But we tend to make that big mistake: spend too much money or give up sex.

The first date should not entail sex or spending excessive money. Some of you have now lost interest. For those of you that are still reading, ask yourselves, "What is the first date?"

The first date is an interview. Nothing more, nothing less. Again, if you're a man or a woman of quality and substance, you will respect this perspective. The first date should NEVER be a dinner and a movie.  The first date is supposed to be two potential partners learning about each other. This requires complete, intense, undivided attention-just as when you're on an interview.

Great places to hold such interviews are bookstores or coffee shops. I prefer two-in-one: Barnes and Nobles with a Starbucks, or a Borders with a coffee shop. Why is this essential? Primarily, a bookstore will indicate if the applicant is into reading and what kind of literature interests that person. After the two of you have some chatter while browsing through some aisles, it's time to grab a cup of tea or coffee with a danish and really get to know each other.

Why is this perfect? It's quiet. It's serene. It creates an atmosphere to get close, but not too close. It forces eye contact. You get to read body language. Ultimately, the two of you get to have an one-on-one dialogue. Allow the conversation to signify what that person has to offer you, or what you have to offer that person. Just as you would sell yourself on an interview, sell yourself on the first date (no pun intended, lol). 

Most women want a guy that is romantic, sentimental, sensitive, financially stable, family oriented, and physically endowed. Highlight your qualities just as you would on an interview. Most men prefer a woman that is employed, drama-free with no children, and financially responsible. Personally, I prefer a woman that stimulates me mentally, is emotionally stable, financially responsible, and has a high sex-drive.

Nevertheless, the first date should be a means of you finding out whether or not that person has what you are looking for in a spouse. Ask the necessary questions. Take the time to get to know that person. If that person succeeds on this interview, that person must take the "three-part" interview.

This interview is where the ideal applicant meets your family. Your family must interview this applicant because your family is the company or organization that this applicant wants to be apart of, right? If you apply for a job, after you succeed on the first interview, don't you take a three-part interview? Aren't you asked a series of questions by different sorts of managers? So be ready to meet the parents and annoying siblings.

Fellas, once she passes both interviews, then you can take her out for a dinner and a movie. Ladies, once he passes both interviews and proves himself worthy, then you can give him a feel of your ruby. It doesn't get any better than this.

Saturday, February 23, 2013

The Girlfriend Application

The Girlfriend Application

Relationships require work. It involves labor. Physical labor. Emotional labor. Mental labor. Financial labor. Spiritual labor. You get the point, right? 

Like with most jobs, before you get hired, you must fill out an application and undergo an interview. Well, if relationships are jobs, why aren't people filling out applications and undergoing interviews? 

The Girlfriend Application is not merely a jab at the female gender. It is an application that every man should hand to any female of romantic interest. This application is supposed to deter arguing, bickering, financial debt, headaches, stress and everything else that accompanies a relationship with a woman that is not compatible. Although it lacks some important material that address elements such as emotional, financial, behavioral, and mental, overall, it is still is valuable. 

What are some of the highlights of this application? The applicant is forced to be informative. Immediately, she lets her potential companion know whether or not she has any children. Why is this imperative? Some men are no longer interested in dating women that have children. Personally, I met a woman that did not tell me she had a child until I asked and I need to know whether or not my potential mate has children or not.

In addition, the applicant is compelled to address her sex life. Is she sexually promiscuous? Why is this important? Her past determines your future. Do you really want a woman that has been around the neighborhood? I didn't think so. So if you meet a woman that has had 20 sex partners and she is only 25, a red flag should be thrown. Given the case if you're a man of quality and substance. Personally, I do not want a woman that has sucked a hundred expletive. Let's not forget to mention that she just might have a STD from her sexual promiscuity. 

My favorite? Does she work out? I love to exercise. I like to be fit and in shape. It's only fair that my companion is fit and in shape, too. Most guys just want a woman that has shape (i.e., hour glass, coke bottle) and not a woman that is in shape. So if you're the health and fitness kind of guy, this inquiry is very helpful.

Now of course every guy is different. Some guys don't even care if a woman has kids, if she's employed, or if she's in shape; as long as he can get a expletive, he is A-O-K. For those us that are looking for something more than just an ejaculation, a girlfriend application is a necessity. I suggest that you download, print, and use this application. Let that woman know that a relationship is a job! If she wants the position of girlfriend, she has to be the ideal candidate. She has to first fill out an application to see if she qualifies. Once she completes the application, the first date should be the interview.

What should the first date entail? Definitely not the traditional dinner and then a movie. I will have The First Date for you by tomorrow.

Special recognition to my boy Uncle Paulie for uploading this application to Facebook.







Friday, February 22, 2013

andRe Christos Helios: The Meaning

andRe Christos Helios: The Anointed Sun God

Some of you are probably wondering, "What the hell is he up to with that andRe Christos Helios crap?!"

Well, my name is Andre, but andRe renders the Egyptian Sun god, Ra, or Re (this is why it is spelled andRe). Christos Helios means Anointed Sun. In Greek mythology, Helios (Apollo) is a solar deity. With the dawn of Christianity, early Christians merged Christ (i.e. ,a solar deity) and Helios as one god: Christos Helios; Christ was worshiped as a Sun god by  early Christians; thus, the name Christos Helios. You can still see icons of Christ in Helios' chariots with the Sun behind him today.

The Christos according to Occult Science

So andRe Christos Helios means andRe, the Anointed Sun God. It is an amalgamation of Egyptian, Greek, and Christian Sun worship. The last known person in history to personify oneself with the Sun was Louis XIV, the Sun King (Le Roi Soleil). 

See, you just learned something new.

Thursday, February 21, 2013

New Walmart in SW Atlanta: Injustice to African-Americans

I'm a patron of Walmart. I enjoy shopping for groceries and not having to spend an arm and leg for food. For those of you that shop at Publix, you know that Walmart has some of the same products as Publix, but not as expensive.

I moved to Atlanta from Florida five months ago. All of the Walmarts that I have been to in Florida: Deltona, Orange City, Sanford, and New Smyrna, were great Walmarts. Upon arriving in Atlanta, I longed for a Walmart. The only one that I knew of is located at Chamblee. Which isn't bad; the Gold line train to Doraville will take you there and it's a five-minute walk from the train station. The only setback is the commute. No one really wants to travel on a train with bags of groceries.

In an effort to ameliorate this situation, Walmart constructed a store on Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, in SW Atlanta. Recently, the was recently opened. Initially, this appeared to be a hit! A Walmart in "the hood". Business was destined to be prosperous. Customers would love it! No more riding out to Chamblee!

WRONG!!

The New Walmart on MLK Jr. Dr. is a bust!! It's the SMALLEST Walmart I have ever seen!! The aisle are ridiculous. One second you're in an aisle and five steps later, you're out of it!! The electronics section is a joke!! There isn't that feel of TV heaven in this particular Walmart. There are about a handful of TV's on display. That goes for laptops, too. Movie section? I've seen more selections of movies at South Dekalb Mall.

Don't get me started on the registers! I had to wait thirty minutes one morning just for some peanut butter!! There weren't any "10 items or less" lanes available. Then on a separate occasion, there were only two registers open. In a Walmart? Really? At ten in the morning and you only have TWO registers open?

If you're skeptical, go in and see for yourself. You will hear disgruntled patrons vowing to never return. The only great thing about this Walmart is that it's "in the hood". It's right there. You don't have to drive or ride the train up to Chamblee. That's it!!

If you want to do some comfortable shopping where you can actually purchase what you 're looking for because the store actually has the product, or not crash into someone's cart because the aisles are so small, go to the Walmart in Chamblee. The new Walmart in the black community is an injustice to African-Americans. Would you believe that they actually have security guards posted up in this Walmart?? For what??!! The store is so small, you would have to be blind not to see someone stealing if you're an employee.

It's a complete flop. I'm not going back again. Don't waste your time, energy, money, or food stamps at this Walmart.

Monday, February 18, 2013

Emasculated Boyfriends . . .


When I didn't show any backbone and didn't stand up for myself, I was "nice, loving, and compromising". Those are the words of my ex. As long as I kept my mouth quiet and "tolerated" unappealing characteristics and didn't argue with her, I was the "best boyfriend ever".

Then things became overbearing. The negativity increased and my patience decreased. I started showing backbone. I started speaking up. I began to show disapproval of certain things and it was voiced. Suddenly, I became mean-spirited, a jerk, an asshole, and intolerant.

Is it just me, or are most women looking for a man that they can dominate, control and ultimately, emasculate? My ex was infamous for trying to shove down my throat, "The woman runs the house; she wears the pants in the house." Never mind the fact that she was not working. In addition, she adamantly believed that "the woman is always right".

If you've ever dated or know someone that is dating a  expletive  as this, you can testify that this kind of woman is  dominating, controlling and as a result, it compels the boyfriend (or if you was stupid enough, husband) to lose his masculinity.  She leads, he follows. He has to consult with her for any and everything. She says, "Jump!" and he asks, "How high?" Nothing goes down without her say so. Oh-and don't dare argue with her!

There isn't anything wrong with expressing your perspective. A loving and respectful spouse will value your perspective. If a man has to bite his tongue because the "woman of his dreams" will become irritated and confrontational if he shows some backbone, what does that say about the "love of his life"?

Don't be an emasculated boyfriend. If you're confused to what an emasculated boyfriend  is, look in the mirror. Do you let her be right when she is clearly wrong? Do you consult with her on things that really doesn't need her insight? Do you let her speak to you in any tone she pleases? Does she talk at  you as if you're her child instead of talking to  you like an adult? Does everything seem one-sided (i.e., everything is in her favor)? If so, you are an emasculated boyfriend.

Grow a pair. Don't be an emasculated boyfriend. Don't let her control and dominate you just so that you can get some nookie. Understand that you have the right to speak your mind just as much as she does. If she wants to wear the pants in the house, then tell her to mow the lawn. Tell her to get under the car and change the oil. Tell her to get off of her ass and get a job (i.e., sits home all day and thinks washing dishes is "work").

Be A MAN!!! Not an emasculated boyfriend

Friday, February 15, 2013

Pope Benedict XVI: The REAL Reason for his Resignation . . .

Pope Been-A-Dick Decides To Resign as Pontiff of the Roman Church

This one is a head scratcher for many reasons. Although this is not the first Pontiff to resign as the Vicar of Christ, one must wonder, "Why does someone submit a resignation as Pope?" After all, this is a luxurious vocation. There is talk that Joseph A. Ratzinger is experiencing detrimental health issues. Whatever the case may be, where is the Roman Catholic god in all of this?

When I first learned that Been-A-Dick was resigning as Pope, I questioned the motive behind it: Was this a power move by the elite? Had Ratzinger failed to complete a mission? Has someone new been selected to carry out the plan? 

Again, who quits as Pope?  Ever met a Catholic? Catholics are pious to the tenth power; a Pope is lauded by Catholics. Popes are heralded as Christ on earth. In addition to that, the Roman Catholic Church is one of the most affluent and powerful organizations ever! Who relinquishes that kind of wealth and power? Are you scratching your head yet?

Aside from the secular aspect of being a Pope, let us bring some attention to the religious aspect of it; would it not seem appropriate to conclude that the Roman Catholic god appointed Mr. Ratzinger as the Bishop of Rome? Was he not the Christian god's choice? To a skeptic as myself, why would the god of Catholicism appoint someone as Pope just to have him resign? 

More importantly, where is divine intervention? Let's just say that there are health issues; where are the miracles? Where is the power of prayer? Why hasn't the Christian god healed the Roman Pontiff? If Christ can raise Lazarus from the dead, surely he can heal his Vicar, right? Still not scratching your head?

Given any case, we know that the Catholic Church has a chronic history of deception and secrecy. Can we genuinely believe that Pope Benedict XVI has health issues and that is the reason for his resignation  at the end of February? What if there is something that the public is not supposed to know? What if there are other reasons for his resignation that involves sinister motives? Who surrenders a vocation as Pope, a position that offers fame, power, and money? There is something underneath the veil that we do not know. But do know, "whatever is hid in the dark, shall be brought to the light".

andRe Christos Helios


Sunday, February 10, 2013

Paid Relationship


Paid Relationship. Don't act confused or bewildered; you know what a paid relationship is. For those of you not in the loop, paid relationships are situations where a person is sexually involved with another for profit. If you give your "man" some because he pays a bill, then you're in a paid relationship. If you give your "man" some because he bought you a Louis Stewart bag, you are in a paid relationship. You provided sex for a profit. If you give your "man" some because he bought you a ring or a bracelet, you are in a paid relationship. A person that provides sexual relations to a person that pays for sex is what?

Yes, I know what you're thinking, "I ain't no ho." Really? You aren't one? What is a prostitute? What is ho? A person that provides sex in exchange for profit-whether it's monetary or material gain, has always been classified as a prostitute. If you disagree, go to the Casual Encounters section on Craigslist. There are dozens of ads that suggest sex-for-profit. Some prostitutes attempt to sophisticate their base profession by using the word donation. Moreover, the hos on Eros-Guide will insist that they are not prostituting, either. They suggest that their $300-sometimes $400- fee is for companionship; in the event of "companionship", sex might occur, but that is not what they are paid for. These high-end hookers insist that they are paid for companionship and companionship only.

It's sad, isn't it? Not even hookers want to admit that they are hookers. Nevertheless, dress it up however you want, a ho provides sexual relations for a profit. Period. It doesn't matter if that ho has a hundred clients, or if that ho has one client that is wrongly identified as a spouse. A person that receives a profit for providing sexual favors is a ho, a prostitute, a hooker, a tramp-case closed. A monogamous ho is still a ho-right or wrong? If your "man" is only getting some when he pays a bill, or when you get your nails done, hair done or you profit in some kind of way, how are you not a ho?

Yes, I know what you're thinking. I know what you're thinking because I have had "girlfriends" tell me this before: Nothing in this world is free. They couldn't be intimate solely out of expressing love. If they were going to give it up, it was on the grounds that they were getting something in return. This brings me to my point and the thesis of this blog: you are a ho if you only have sex with the expectance of some kind of financial or material gain. More importantly, you are in a paid relationship if you sex is provided in exchange for material or monetary gain. Yes, I know what you're thinking, "I ain't no ho." Really? You aren't one? What is a prostitute? What is ho? A person that provides sex in exchange for profit-whether it's monetary or material gain, has always been classified as a prostitute. If you disagree, go to the Casual Encounters section on Craigslist. There are dozens of ads that suggest sex-for-profit. Some prostitutes attempt to sophisticate their base profession by using the word donation. Moreover, the hos on Eros-Guide will insist that they are not prostituting, either. They suggest that their $300-sometimes $400- fee is for companionship; in the event of "companionship", sex might occur, but that is not what they are paid for. These high-end hookers insist that they are paid for companionship and companionship only.

It's sad, isn't it? Not even hookers want to admit that they are hookers. Nevertheless, dress it up however you want, a ho provides sexual relations for a profit. Period. It doesn't matter if that ho has a hundred clients, or if that ho has one client that is wrongly identified as a spouse. A person that receives a profit for providing sexual favors is a ho, a prostitute, a hooker, a tramp-case closed. A monogamous ho is still a ho-right or wrong? If your "man" is only getting some when he pays a bill, or when you get your nails done, hair done or you profit in some kind of way, how are you not a ho?

Yes, I know what you're thinking. I know what you're thinking because I have had "girlfriends" tell me this before: Nothing in this world is free. They couldn't be intimate solely out of expressing love. If they were going to give it up, it was on the grounds that they were getting something in return. This brings me to my point and the thesis of this blog: you are a ho if you only have sex with the expectance of some kind of financial or material gain. More importantly, you are in a paid relationship if sex is provided in exchange for material or monetary gain.

andRe Christos Helios
The YHWH, His Royal Rudeness, K.O.C.

andRe Christos Helios

Sex, Religion, Politics



Sex, Religion, Politics. Why sex, religion, and politics? Sex, religion and politics are three sensitive topics. You hear some people say, "There are three things I don't talk about: sex, religion and politics." Fortunately, I am not as empathetic as they are. As far as I am concerned, these are subjects that are not sensitive, but intriguing and captivating.

So let's reword that sentence immediately: sex, religion and politics are three interesting topics. Plus, if there is a scenario where more than one topic intertwines, the situation becomes more engaging. For instance, let's travel through time for a little bit. A few years ago, there was a New York politician that e-mailed raunchy photos of himself. The story made headlines for weeks. The media had a ball, and the public loved it; money was spent and money was made. Why? It was an interesting story and it was easy to sell for two reasons: it involved politics and sex. Then with the name Weiner . . . how could the story not be interesting?

I'm a smart man. I know what sells. Hands down-sex sells. People are interested in sex. We love to read about it. We love to watch it. Some of us even enjoy being behind the camera. At the end of the day, any topic that is sexually related is going to get your attention. In addition to that, how many people are religious? We've just exited the holiday season. I could have written about Thanksgiving, Christmas, Kwanza, Hanukah and someone would have read it. At the end of the day, it's going to develop interest. We just had the presidential elections. Need I say more?

Sex, Religion, Politics are topics or issues that are unavoidable because they are apart of our daily lives. I am motivated to generate income off of blogging. What's better than to talk about sex, religion, and politics? When all fails, I'll just upload a picture of a woman with a lustful ass and that's it!! I'll have a following (in fact, I'll make that a topic: Nice Asses.

The Mayhem, the Havoc, and the Controversy continue with . . . Sex, Religion, Politics.

andRe Christos Helios
the YHWH, His Royal Rudeness, K.O.C.